Quantum2 Highlights
A newsletter of the Dialog leadership development program for information professionals
Dear Quantum2 Member...
As you gear up for the fall activities of budgeting
and just how to ask for those necessary resources,
why not take some time to hone your negotiation skills
by making use of the styles we describe in our topic
of the month?
Spotlight on Quantum2 InfoStar
Tom
Froehlich
In preparing the next generation of information
professionals for the challenges of tomorrow, Dr.
Thomas J. Froehlich has distinguished himself as
a visionary in the field of information science,
which has earned him the title of Quantum2 InfoStar.
Tom is the chief architect and director of the
interdisciplinary master’s program in Information
Architecture and Knowledge Management (http://iakm.kent.edu),
which opened at Kent State University in 2001 (Kent,
Ohio).
To read more about Tom, visit the Quantum2 Web site.
Special Interest Corner
From time to time, we encounter sessions we think
might be of interest to specific segments of our
market. Coming up on October 19 is a session on competitive
intelligence and data mining sponsor by SLA ClickU.
Visit
here for more information and to register.
Quantum2 Topic of the Month
Negotiation Styles
With budget preparation in full swing, the subject
of negotiation seems to be a topic of current interest.
Consequently, we are offering a second set of tips
for developing your negotiation skills—that
of negotiation styles.
Negotiation styles can be generally characterized
into “soft” and “hard”. Soft
techniques involve collegiality, teamwork and a mutual
commitment to solve a problem. Hard styles focus
more on being tough and sometimes coercive or manipulative
to get a result. Here are five classic negotiation
styles with descriptions and suggested appropriate
use.
- Compromising — Concedes minor
objectives to achieve more important ones; divides
needs to satisfy both parties; appropriate when
complete agreement is unreachable because of mutually
exclusive objectives.
- Accommodating — Passive; effective
when certain objectives are more important to one
party; do not use if other party is untruthful,
manipulative or unethical.
- Collaborating — Most time-consuming
but encourages creative thinking and problem solving
and builds trust; only use if willing to work together
for mutual benefit as likely to brainstorm ideas
together, agree on solution, then commit to execution;
do not use if only a minor objective or immediate
decision is necessary.
- Avoiding (withdrawing) — Can
create feelings of frustration and aggravation;
restricts development of relationships; use only
if objective is minor and withdrawing will save
time and resources.
- Competing — Use of threats,
ultimatums causes hostility and resentment; prevents
long-term relationships; use only when there is
an imbalance of power, information or qualifications
on one side; inappropriate when involves several
complex objectives or when objectives are more
important to one party; avoid if both have equal
power.
The session surrounding these negotiation styles
is being offered via the Web on November 16, 2006.
Register now to attend this WebEx session.
As always, your suggestions for workshop topics are welcomed. Also, if you know a friend or colleague who would benefit from Quantum2, please encourage them to sign up today.
Regards,
Betty Jo Hibberd
Senior Manager
North America
IPMD, Dialog
|